Telehealth Platforms and Billing Compliance

Telehealth Platforms and Billing Compliance

Challenges Faced in Traditional Medical Coding Processes

In the rapidly evolving landscape of healthcare, telehealth services have emerged as a pivotal component, offering unprecedented convenience and accessibility to patients worldwide. As telehealth platforms continue to gain traction, the importance of medical coding in ensuring billing compliance cannot be overstated. Medical coding serves as the backbone of efficient healthcare delivery by translating patient encounters into standardized codes that accurately represent diagnoses, procedures, and services provided.


At the heart of telehealth's success lies its ability to bridge geographical gaps and deliver timely care without compromising quality. However, this innovative model introduces unique challenges in terms of billing and compliance. Accurate medical coding ensures that healthcare providers are appropriately reimbursed for their services while maintaining adherence to regulatory requirements. In telehealth settings, where traditional face-to-face interactions are replaced by virtual consultations, precise coding becomes even more critical to capture the nuances of remote care delivery.


Hiring skilled medical staff ensures adherence to healthcare industry standards medical staffing income statement.

One key aspect of medical coding in telehealth is its role in facilitating accurate reimbursement processes. Insurance companies rely on standardized codes to determine coverage eligibility and payment amounts for services rendered remotely. Without proper coding practices, healthcare providers risk facing claim denials or delays in payment processing. This can lead to financial strain on both providers and patients alike, potentially limiting access to these vital services.


Moreover, medical coding plays an essential role in ensuring compliance with various federal regulations governing telehealth services. For instance, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) mandates strict guidelines for privacy and security when handling patient information electronically. Accurate coding helps maintain these standards by ensuring that all relevant data is properly documented and safeguarded against potential breaches.


Telehealth platforms also benefit from robust medical coding practices through improved data analysis capabilities. By systematically categorizing patient encounters using standardized codes, healthcare organizations can gather valuable insights into trends such as common conditions treated via telemedicine or areas where additional training might be needed among clinicians utilizing these platforms.


Furthermore, consistent use of accurate codes fosters transparency within the healthcare system by providing clear documentation trails during audits conducted by regulatory bodies or insurance companies seeking validation for claims submitted under telemedicine provisions.


In conclusion,the significance of medical coding extends beyond mere administrative tasks; it forms an integral part of delivering effective telehealth services while maintaining billing compliance within established legal frameworks . As technology continues reshaping how we approach healthcare delivery ,the need for proficient coders who understand both clinical intricacies involved alongside technical aspects inherent within digital health solutions will only become more pronounced . Ensuring accuracy throughout every step along this process not only guarantees fair compensation but also safeguards patients' rights ultimately contributing towards building trust between stakeholders involved across all levels thereby fostering sustainable growth throughout entire industry ecosystem .

The proliferation of telehealth platforms has revolutionized the healthcare landscape, enabling patients to access medical care remotely and conveniently. However, with this innovation comes a complex web of billing compliance requirements that healthcare providers must navigate to ensure ethical and legal operation. Understanding these requirements is crucial for the successful implementation and management of telehealth services.


Billing compliance in telehealth involves adherence to regulations set forth by various governing bodies, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), state health departments, and private insurers. These regulations are designed to prevent fraud, ensure accurate reimbursement, and protect patient information.


One of the primary aspects of billing compliance is ensuring that services billed are covered under telehealth provisions. Not all medical services qualify for remote delivery reimbursement, so providers need to be well-versed in which procedures can be billed as telehealth encounters. This often requires staying updated with changing policies, as coverage criteria can evolve rapidly in response to technological advancements and public health needs.


Moreover, documentation plays a critical role in billing compliance. Telehealth consultations must be documented meticulously, capturing all necessary details such as patient consent for virtual visits, the technology used during the consultation, duration of the session, and clinical notes that justify the necessity of the service provided. Accurate documentation not only supports billing claims but also safeguards against potential audits or investigations into fraudulent practices.


Another layer of complexity arises from varying state laws governing telehealth services. Each state may have different licensing requirements for healthcare providers delivering telemedicine across state lines. Furthermore, interstate compacts and waivers might influence how services are billed when treating out-of-state patients. Providers must be diligent about understanding these nuances to maintain compliance across jurisdictions.


Privacy regulations such as those mandated by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) also intersect with billing compliance in telehealth settings. Ensuring secure data transmission during virtual consultations is paramount to protecting patient confidentiality while complying with legal standards.


In conclusion, navigating billing compliance requirements for telehealth platforms demands a comprehensive understanding of federal guidelines, state-specific laws, insurance policies, documentation best practices, and privacy protections. As telemedicine continues to expand its reach within healthcare systems worldwide, providers who prioritize compliance will not only mitigate risks but also enhance trust with patients by delivering reliable and lawful care remotely.

Key Benefits of Implementing AI Tools for Medical Coding

The emergence of telehealth platforms has transformed the landscape of healthcare delivery, offering patients unprecedented access to medical consultations from the comfort of their homes. This shift has been accelerated by recent global events, underscoring the need for accessible and efficient healthcare solutions. However, with this transformation comes a host of challenges, particularly in ensuring accurate medical coding for remote consultations-a crucial aspect that directly impacts billing compliance.


Medical coding is fundamentally about translating healthcare services into standardized codes used for billing purposes. In traditional in-person visits, these codes are based on well-documented interactions between patients and healthcare providers. However, remote consultations introduce complexities that can complicate this process. One primary challenge is the variability in how telehealth services are delivered-ranging from video calls to phone consultations and even asynchronous messaging-which can result in discrepancies in documentation and subsequent coding.


Telehealth encounters often lack the physical examination component that traditionally informs diagnosis and treatment plans, making it difficult for coders to determine the appropriate level of service provided. This absence can lead to either under-coding or over-coding: under-coding may result in financial losses for providers due to inadequate reimbursement, while over-coding could trigger audits or penalties for billing errors.


Moreover, regulations and guidelines surrounding telehealth coding are continually evolving as technology advances and more providers adopt these platforms. This dynamic environment requires constant vigilance from both healthcare providers and coders to stay compliant with current rules-a task that is complicated by variations in policies across different jurisdictions or payer systems.


To address these challenges, robust training programs for coders focusing on telehealth-specific scenarios are essential. Coders must be adept at interpreting clinical notes within the context of virtual interactions, understanding nuances such as time spent on patient engagement versus technical issues during a consultation.


Additionally, investments in comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) systems tailored to support telehealth services can help streamline documentation processes. These systems should integrate features that facilitate seamless data capture during remote consultations-such as templates optimized for virtual care-to ensure consistency and accuracy in coding practices.


Collaboration between technology developers and regulatory bodies is also key to developing standardized frameworks that simplify coding processes across various telehealth modalities. Clear guidelines will provide much-needed clarity for both practitioners and coders navigating this new terrain.


In conclusion, while telehealth platforms offer remarkable opportunities for expanding access to care, they also present significant challenges when it comes to ensuring accurate medical coding for remote consultations. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach involving education, technological innovation, and regulatory collaboration-all aimed at fostering an environment where quality care is delivered efficiently without compromising billing compliance. As we continue down this path towards digital health integration, it remains imperative that we prioritize accuracy in medical coding as a cornerstone of sustainable telemedicine practices.

Key Benefits of Implementing AI Tools for Medical Coding

Case Studies Showcasing Successful AI Integration in Medical Coding Operations

In recent years, the healthcare industry has witnessed a significant transformation with the rise of telehealth services, which have revolutionized the way patients and healthcare providers interact. As telehealth becomes increasingly integrated into mainstream healthcare, the importance of efficient billing processes cannot be overstated. In this context, technology and software solutions play a pivotal role in streamlining telehealth billing, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements while enhancing operational efficiency.


Telehealth platforms have provided a new frontier for delivering medical care remotely, offering convenience and accessibility to both patients and providers. However, the complexity of billing for these services can pose challenges. Unlike traditional in-person visits, telehealth involves numerous variables such as varying state laws, insurance policies, and coding regulations that must be meticulously managed to ensure accurate billing. This is where technology steps in as an indispensable ally.


Advanced software solutions are designed to automate many aspects of the billing process for telehealth services. These tools can handle everything from patient registration to claim submission with remarkable precision. By automating these tasks, healthcare organizations can significantly reduce errors that often occur with manual data entry-errors that could lead to claim rejections or delays in payment.


One key area where technology has made a substantial impact is in ensuring compliance with billing regulations. Compliance is critical given the intricate web of federal and state regulations governing telehealth services. Software solutions can be programmed to incorporate up-to-date rules and guidelines into their systems, providing real-time alerts for any discrepancies or potential compliance issues during the billing process. This proactive approach not only minimizes the risk of non-compliance but also safeguards healthcare providers from legal repercussions.


Moreover, technology facilitates seamless integration between various components of telehealth platforms and electronic health records (EHR). This integration ensures that all relevant patient information is readily available during consultations and subsequently reflected accurately in billing statements. Such interoperability enhances transparency and improves communication between providers and payers-a crucial factor in expediting payment cycles.


The use of analytics powered by artificial intelligence further exemplifies how technology optimizes telehealth billing processes. By analyzing large volumes of data swiftly and accurately, AI-driven analytics provide valuable insights into billing trends and patterns. Healthcare organizations can leverage these insights to identify inefficiencies within their current systems or develop strategies to optimize revenue cycles.


In addition to improving efficiency within individual practices or hospitals, technology-enabled telehealth billing solutions contribute positively towards patient satisfaction as well. When patients receive clear bills free from errors alongside prompt responses regarding insurance claims or outstanding balances-thanks largely due automated systems-they are likely more satisfied overall resulting potentially increased loyalty towards their chosen provider network over time too!


In conclusion; embracing technological advancements proves crucial when it comes navigating complexities associated specifically around TeleHealth Billing especially given ever-evolving regulatory environment surrounding same matter today! Software Solutions offer immense benefits helping streamline operations whilst simultaneously maintaining strict adherence requisite standards thus ultimately enabling smoother experience across board - whether you're considering perspective clinician OR consumer alike!

Potential Risks and Ethical Considerations in Using AI for Medical Coding

Case Studies: Success Stories and Lessons Learned from Implementing Compliant Telehealth Billing Practices


The advent of telehealth has revolutionized the healthcare landscape, providing unprecedented access to medical services. However, with this new avenue comes the challenge of navigating billing compliance. Successfully implementing compliant telehealth billing practices not only ensures adherence to regulations but also enhances operational efficiency and patient satisfaction. This essay explores notable case studies that highlight success stories and lessons learned in this domain.


One exemplary case is that of a large healthcare network in the Midwest that implemented a comprehensive telehealth program. Initially, they faced hurdles related to coding errors and claim denials due to non-compliance with state-specific regulations. The organization's leadership responded by investing in specialized training for their billing staff, focusing on correct coding practices and updates on regulatory changes. Additionally, they integrated advanced billing software capable of flagging potential compliance issues before claims were submitted.


The result was a significant reduction in claim rejections and an increase in successful reimbursements. More importantly, the organization reported enhanced patient experiences as financial transparency improved trust between patients and the provider network. This case underscores the importance of continuous education and technological investment as critical components for compliant billing practices.


Another compelling example is a small rural clinic that initially struggled with aligning its telehealth services with Medicare's evolving guidelines. Facing resource constraints, the clinic opted for a strategic partnership with a telehealth platform known for its robust compliance features. The platform provided automated updates on policy changes and offered real-time support for complex billing scenarios.


Through this collaboration, the clinic not only achieved compliance but also expanded its service reach without compromising financial integrity. The key takeaway from this case is that leveraging external expertise through partnerships can be an effective strategy for smaller entities operating under limited resources.


On a broader scale, these cases highlight several lessons essential for any healthcare provider looking to optimize their telehealth billing practices:




  1. Education is Paramount: Continuous training programs are vital to keep staff updated on changing regulations and best practices.




  2. Invest in Technology: Advanced billing systems can preemptively identify compliance issues, reducing errors and improving reimbursement rates.




  3. Leverage Partnerships: Collaborating with experienced telehealth platforms or consultants can provide valuable insights and resources beyond internal capabilities.




  4. Adaptability: Staying flexible and responsive to policy changes ensures sustained compliance over time.




In conclusion, while the transition to telehealth presents challenges in terms of billing compliance, it also offers opportunities for growth and improvement within healthcare systems. By learning from successful implementations-whether through internal reforms or strategic partnerships-providers can navigate these complexities effectively. Ultimately, embracing such practices leads not only to regulatory adherence but also fosters trustful patient-provider relationships rooted in transparency and reliability.

 

Financial statement analysis (or just financial analysis) is the process of reviewing and analyzing a company's financial statements to make better economic decisions to earn income in future. These statements include the income statement, balance sheet, statement of cash flows, notes to accounts and a statement of changes in equity (if applicable). Financial statement analysis is a method or process involving specific techniques for evaluating risks, performance, valuation, financial health, and future prospects of an organization.[1]

It is used by a variety of stakeholders, such as credit and equity investors, the government, the public, and decision-makers within the organization. These stakeholders have different interests and apply a variety of different techniques to meet their needs. For example, equity investors are interested in the long-term earnings power of the organization and perhaps the sustainability and growth of dividend payments. Creditors want to ensure the interest and principal is paid on the organizations debt securities (e.g., bonds) when due.

Common methods of financial statement analysis include horizontal and vertical analysis and the use of financial ratios. Historical information combined with a series of assumptions and adjustments to the financial information may be used to project future performance. The Chartered Financial Analyst designation is available for professional financial analysts.

History

[edit]

Benjamin Graham and David Dodd first published their influential book "Security Analysis" in 1934.[2] [3] A central premise of their book is that the market's pricing mechanism for financial securities such as stocks and bonds is based upon faulty and irrational analytical processes performed by many market participants. This results in the market price of a security only occasionally coinciding with the intrinsic value around which the price tends to fluctuate.[4] Investor Warren Buffett is a well-known supporter of Graham and Dodd's philosophy.

The Graham and Dodd approach is referred to as Fundamental analysis and includes: 1) Economic analysis; 2) Industry analysis; and 3) Company analysis. The latter is the primary realm of financial statement analysis. On the basis of these three analyses the intrinsic value of the security is determined.[4]

Horizontal and vertical analysis

[edit]

Horizontal analysis compares financial information over time, typically from past quarters or years. Horizontal analysis is performed by comparing financial data from a past statement, such as the income statement. When comparing this past information one will want to look for variations such as higher or lower earnings.[5]

Vertical analysis is a percentage analysis of financial statements. Each line item listed in the financial statement is listed as the percentage of another line item. For example, on an income statement each line item will be listed as a percentage of gross sales. This technique is also referred to as normalization[6] or common-sizing.[5]

Financial ratio analysis

[edit]

Financial ratios are very powerful tools to perform some quick analysis of financial statements. There are four main categories of ratios: liquidity ratios, profitability ratios, activity ratios and leverage ratios. These are typically analyzed over time and across competitors in an industry.

  • Liquidity ratios are used to determine how quickly a company can turn its assets into cash if it experiences financial difficulties or bankruptcy. It essentially is a measure of a company's ability to remain in business. A few common liquidity ratios are the current ratio and the liquidity index. The current ratio is current assets/current liabilities and measures how much liquidity is available to pay for liabilities. The liquidity index shows how quickly a company can turn assets into cash and is calculated by: (Trade receivables x Days to liquidate) + (Inventory x Days to liquidate)/Trade Receivables + Inventory.
  • Profitability ratios are ratios that demonstrate how profitable a company is. A few popular profitability ratios are the breakeven point and gross profit ratio. The breakeven point calculates how much cash a company must generate to break even with their start up costs. The gross profit ratio is equal to gross profit/revenue. This ratio shows a quick snapshot of expected revenue.
  • Activity ratios are meant to show how well management is managing the company's resources. Two common activity ratios are accounts payable turnover and accounts receivable turnover. These ratios demonstrate how long it takes for a company to pay off its accounts payable and how long it takes for a company to receive payments, respectively.
  • Leverage ratios depict how much a company relies upon its debt to fund operations. A very common leverage ratio used for financial statement analysis is the debt-to-equity ratio. This ratio shows the extent to which management is willing to use debt in order to fund operations. This ratio is calculated as: (Long-term debt + Short-term debt + Leases)/ Equity.[7]

DuPont analysis uses several financial ratios that multiplied together equal return on equity, a measure of how much income the firm earns divided by the amount of funds invested (equity).

A Dividend discount model (DDM) may also be used to value a company's stock price based on the theory that its stock is worth the sum of all of its future dividend payments, discounted back to their present value.[8] In other words, it is used to value stocks based on the net present value of the future dividends.

Financial statement analyses are typically performed in spreadsheet software — or specialized accounting software — and summarized in a variety of formats.

Recasting financial statements

[edit]

An earnings recast is the act of amending and re-releasing a previously released earnings statement, with specified intent.[9]

Investors need to understand the ability of the company to generate profit. This, together with its rate of profit growth, relative to the amount of capital deployed and various other financial ratios, forms an important part of their analysis of the value of the company. Analysts may modify ("recast") the financial statements by adjusting the underlying assumptions to aid in this computation. For example, operating leases (treated like a rental transaction) may be recast as capital leases (indicating ownership), adding assets and liabilities to the balance sheet. This affects the financial statement ratios.[10]

Recasting is also known as normalizing accounts.[11]

Certifications

[edit]

Financial analysts typically have finance and accounting education at the undergraduate or graduate level. Persons may earn the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation through a series of challenging examinations. Upon completion of the three-part exam, CFAs are considered experts in areas like fundamentals of investing, the valuation of assets, portfolio management, and wealth planning.

See also

[edit]
  • Business valuation
  • Financial audit
  • Financial statement
  • DuPont analysis
  • Data analysis

References

[edit]
  1. ^ White, Gerald I.; Sondhi, Ashwinpaul; Fried, Dov (1998). The Analysis and Use of Financial Statements. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-471-11186-4.
  2. ^ New York Times, August 16, 1998 Gretchen Morgenson – Market Watch MARKET WATCH; A Time To Value Words of Wisdom“ … Security Analysis by Benjamin Graham and David Dodd, the 1934 bible for value investors.”
  3. ^ New York Times, January 2, 2000 Business Section Humbling Lessons From Parties Past By BURTON G. MALKIEL “BENJAMIN GRAHAM, co-author of "Security Analysis," the 1934 bible of value investing, long ago put his finger on the most dangerous words in an investor's vocabulary: "This time is different." Burton G. Malkiel is an economics professor at Princeton University and the author of "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" (W.W. Norton).
  4. ^ a b Dodd, David; Graham, Benjamin (1998). Security Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0-07-013235-6.
  5. ^ a b "Accountingtools.com - Financial Statement Analysis". Archived from the original on 2014-08-11. Retrieved 2014-08-01.
  6. ^ Perceptual Edge-Jonathan Koomey-Best practices for understanding quantitative data-February 14, 2006
  7. ^ Investopedia Staff (2010-08-12). "Financial Statement Analysis". Investopedia. Retrieved 2018-07-14.
  8. ^ McClure, Ben (2004-04-12). "Digging Into The Dividend Discount Model". Investopedia. Retrieved 2018-07-14.
  9. ^ "Earnings Recast".
  10. ^ "Recasting". Archived from the original on 2020-01-21. Retrieved 2019-03-15.
  11. ^ Schenck, Barbara Findlay; Davies, John (3 November 2008). Selling Your Business For Dummies. ISBN 9780470381892.
[edit]
  • Investopedia
  • Beginner's Guide to Financial Statements by SEC.gov

Associations

[edit]
  • SFAF - French Society of Financial Analysts
  • ACIIA - Association of Certified International Investment Analysts
  • EFFAS - European Federation of Financial Analysts Societies

 

Portrait of the Italian Luca Pacioli, painted by Jacopo de' Barbari, 1495, (Museo di Capodimonte). Pacioli is regarded as the Father of Accounting.

Bookkeeping is the recording of financial transactions, and is part of the process of accounting in business and other organizations.[1] It involves preparing source documents for all transactions, operations, and other events of a business. Transactions include purchases, sales, receipts and payments by an individual person, organization or corporation. There are several standard methods of bookkeeping, including the single-entry and double-entry bookkeeping systems. While these may be viewed as "real" bookkeeping, any process for recording financial transactions is a bookkeeping process.

The person in an organisation who is employed to perform bookkeeping functions is usually called the bookkeeper (or book-keeper). They usually write the daybooks (which contain records of sales, purchases, receipts, and payments), and document each financial transaction, whether cash or credit, into the correct daybook—that is, petty cash book, suppliers ledger, customer ledger, etc.—and the general ledger. Thereafter, an accountant can create financial reports from the information recorded by the bookkeeper. The bookkeeper brings the books to the trial balance stage, from which an accountant may prepare financial reports for the organisation, such as the income statement and balance sheet.

History

[edit]

The origin of book-keeping is lost in obscurity, but recent research indicates that methods of keeping accounts have existed from the remotest times of human life in cities. Babylonian records written with styli on small slabs of clay have been found dating to 2600 BC.[2] Mesopotamian bookkeepers kept records on clay tablets that may date back as far as 7,000 years. Use of the modern double entry bookkeeping system was described by Luca Pacioli in 1494.[3]

The term "waste book" was used in colonial America, referring to the documenting of daily transactions of receipts and expenditures. Records were made in chronological order, and for temporary use only. Daily records were then transferred to a daybook or account ledger to balance the accounts and to create a permanent journal; then the waste book could be discarded, hence the name.[4]

Process

[edit]

The primary purpose of bookkeeping is to record the financial effects of transactions. An important difference between a manual and an electronic accounting system is the former's latency between the recording of a financial transaction and its posting in the relevant account. This delay, which is absent in electronic accounting systems due to nearly instantaneous posting to relevant accounts, is characteristic of manual systems, and gave rise to the primary books of accounts—cash book, purchase book, sales book, etc.—for immediately documenting a financial transaction.

In the normal course of business, a document is produced each time a transaction occurs. Sales and purchases usually have invoices or receipts. Historically, deposit slips were produced when lodgements (deposits) were made to a bank account; and checks (spelled "cheques" in the UK and several other countries) were written to pay money out of the account. Nowadays such transactions are mostly made electronically. Bookkeeping first involves recording the details of all of these source documents into multi-column journals (also known as books of first entry or daybooks). For example, all credit sales are recorded in the sales journal; all cash payments are recorded in the cash payments journal. Each column in a journal normally corresponds to an account. In the single entry system, each transaction is recorded only once. Most individuals who balance their check-book each month are using such a system, and most personal-finance software follows this approach.

After a certain period, typically a month, each column in each journal is totalled to give a summary for that period. Using the rules of double-entry, these journal summaries are then transferred to their respective accounts in the ledger, or account book. For example, the entries in the Sales Journal are taken and a debit entry is made in each customer's account (showing that the customer now owes us money), and a credit entry might be made in the account for "Sale of class 2 widgets" (showing that this activity has generated revenue for us). This process of transferring summaries or individual transactions to the ledger is called posting. Once the posting process is complete, accounts kept using the "T" format (debits on the left side of the "T" and credits on the right side) undergo balancing, which is simply a process to arrive at the balance of the account.

As a partial check that the posting process was done correctly, a working document called an unadjusted trial balance is created. In its simplest form, this is a three-column list. Column One contains the names of those accounts in the ledger which have a non-zero balance. If an account has a debit balance, the balance amount is copied into Column Two (the debit column); if an account has a credit balance, the amount is copied into Column Three (the credit column). The debit column is then totalled, and then the credit column is totalled. The two totals must agree—which is not by chance—because under the double-entry rules, whenever there is a posting, the debits of the posting equal the credits of the posting. If the two totals do not agree, an error has been made, either in the journals or during the posting process. The error must be located and rectified, and the totals of the debit column and the credit column recalculated to check for agreement before any further processing can take place.

Once the accounts balance, the accountant makes a number of adjustments and changes the balance amounts of some of the accounts. These adjustments must still obey the double-entry rule: for example, the inventory account and asset account might be changed to bring them into line with the actual numbers counted during a stocktake. At the same time, the expense account associated with use of inventory is adjusted by an equal and opposite amount. Other adjustments such as posting depreciation and prepayments are also done at this time. This results in a listing called the adjusted trial balance. It is the accounts in this list, and their corresponding debit or credit balances, that are used to prepare the financial statements.

Finally financial statements are drawn from the trial balance, which may include:

Single-entry system

[edit]

The primary bookkeeping record in single-entry bookkeeping is the cash book, which is similar to a checking account register (in UK: cheque account, current account), except all entries are allocated among several categories of income and expense accounts. Separate account records are maintained for petty cash, accounts payable and accounts receivable, and other relevant transactions such as inventory and travel expenses. To save time and avoid the errors of manual calculations, single-entry bookkeeping can be done today with do-it-yourself bookkeeping software.

Double-entry system

[edit]

A double-entry bookkeeping system is a set of rules for recording financial information in a financial accounting system in which every transaction or event changes at least two different ledger accounts.

Daybooks

[edit]

A daybook is a descriptive and chronological (diary-like) record of day-to-day financial transactions; it is also called a book of original entry. The daybook's details must be transcribed formally into journals to enable posting to ledgers. Daybooks include:

  • Sales daybook, for recording sales invoices.
  • Sales credits daybook, for recording sales credit notes.
  • Purchases daybook, for recording purchase invoices.
  • Purchases debits daybook, for recording purchase debit notes.
  • Cash daybook, usually known as the cash book, for recording all monies received and all monies paid out. It may be split into two daybooks: a receipts daybook documenting every money-amount received, and a payments daybook recording every payment made.
  • General Journal daybook, for recording journal entries.

Petty cash book

[edit]

A petty cash book is a record of small-value purchases before they are later transferred to the ledger and final accounts; it is maintained by a petty or junior cashier. This type of cash book usually uses the imprest system: a certain amount of money is provided to the petty cashier by the senior cashier. This money is to cater for minor expenditures (hospitality, minor stationery, casual postage, and so on) and is reimbursed periodically on satisfactory explanation of how it was spent. The balance of petty cash book is Asset.

Journals

[edit]

Journals are recorded in the general journal daybook. A journal is a formal and chronological record of financial transactions before their values are accounted for in the general ledger as debits and credits. A company can maintain one journal for all transactions, or keep several journals based on similar activity (e.g., sales, cash receipts, revenue, etc.), making transactions easier to summarize and reference later. For every debit journal entry recorded, there must be an equivalent credit journal entry to maintain a balanced accounting equation.[5][6]

Ledgers

[edit]

A ledger is a record of accounts. The ledger is a permanent summary of all amounts entered in supporting Journals which list individual transactions by date. These accounts are recorded separately, showing their beginning/ending balance. A journal lists financial transactions in chronological order, without showing their balance but showing how much is going to be entered in each account. A ledger takes each financial transaction from the journal and records it into the corresponding accounts. The ledger also determines the balance of every account, which is transferred into the balance sheet or the income statement. There are three different kinds of ledgers that deal with book-keeping:

  • Sales ledger, which deals mostly with the accounts receivable account. This ledger consists of the records of the financial transactions made by customers to the business.
  • Purchase ledger is the record of the company's purchasing transactions; it goes hand in hand with the Accounts Payable account.
  • General ledger, representing the original five, main accounts: assets, liabilities, equity, income, and expenses.

Abbreviations used in bookkeeping

[edit]
  • A/c or Acc – Account
  • A/R – Accounts receivable
  • A/P – Accounts payable
  • B/S – Balance sheet
  • c/d – Carried down
  • b/d – Brought down
  • c/f – Carried forward
  • b/f – Brought forward
  • Dr – Debit side of a ledger. "Dr" stands for "Debit register"
  • Cr – Credit side of a ledger. "Cr" stands for "Credit register"
  • G/L – General ledger; (or N/L – nominal ledger)
  • PL – Profit and loss; (or I/S – income statement)
  • P/L – Purchase Ledger (Accounts payable)
  • P/R – Payroll
  • PP&E – Property, plant and equipment
  • S/L - Sales Ledger (Accounts receivable)
  • TB – Trial Balance
  • GST – Goods and services tax
  • SGST – State goods & service tax
  • CGST – Central goods & service tax
  • IGST- integrated goods & service tax
  • VAT – Value added tax
  • CST – Central sale tax
  • TDS – Tax deducted at source
  • AMT – Alternate minimum tax
  • EBT – Earnings before tax
  • EAT – Earnings after tax
  • PAT – Profit after tax
  • PBT – Profit before tax
  • Dep or Depr – Depreciation
  • CPO – Cash paid out
  • CP - Cash Payment
  • w.e.f. - with effect from
  • @ - at the rate of
  • L/F – ledger folio
  • J/F – Journal Folio
  • M/s- Messrs Account
  • Co- Company
  • V/N or V.no. – voucher number
  • In no -invoice Number

Chart of accounts

[edit]

A chart of accounts is a list of the accounts codes that can be identified with numeric, alphabetical, or alphanumeric codes allowing the account to be located in the general ledger. The equity section of the chart of accounts is based on the fact that the legal structure of the entity is of a particular legal type. Possibilities include sole trader, partnership, trust, and company.[7]

Computerized bookkeeping

[edit]

Computerized bookkeeping removes many of the paper "books" that are used to record the financial transactions of a business entity; instead, relational databases are used today, but typically, these still enforce the norms of bookkeeping including the single-entry and double-entry bookkeeping systems. Certified Public Accountants (CPAs) supervise the internal controls for computerized bookkeeping systems, which serve to minimize errors in documenting the numerous activities a business entity may initiate or complete over an accounting period.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Weygandt; Kieso; Kimmel (2003). Financial Accounting. Susan Elbe. p. 6. ISBN 0-471-07241-9.
  2. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Book-Keeping" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 4 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 225.
  3. ^ "History of Accounting". Fremont University. Retrieved 2022-07-15.
  4. ^ "Pittsburgh Waste Book and Fort Pitt Trading Post Papers". Guides to Archives and Manuscript Collections at the University of Pittsburgh Library System. Retrieved 2015-09-04.
  5. ^ Haber, Jeffry (2004). Accounting Demystified. New York: AMACOM. p. 15. ISBN 0-8144-0790-0.
  6. ^ Raza, SyedA. Accountants Information. p. Accountant in Milton Keynes.
  7. ^ Marsden,Stephen (2008). Australian Master Bookkeepers Guide. Sydney: CCH ISBN 978-1-921593-57-4
[edit]

 

Frequently Asked Questions

Telehealth billing compliance refers to adhering to regulations and guidelines set by healthcare authorities for correctly documenting, coding, and billing telehealth services. It ensures accurate reimbursement while avoiding fraud or abuse.
Commonly used codes for telehealth services include CPT codes like 99441-99443 for phone calls, 99201-99215 for video visits, and HCPCS code G2012 for virtual check-ins. Codes may vary based on payer policies.
To ensure HIPAA compliance, choose a telehealth platform that provides end-to-end encryption, secure access controls, audit trails, and business associate agreements (BAAs) with vendors handling protected health information (PHI).
Compliant billing requires detailed documentation including patient consent for virtual visits, date/time of service, technology used, clinical details discussed or actions taken during the session, and duration when applicable.